O
Hooksett
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Quimby Mountain Stewardship Plan

Hooksett

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 22, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveJohn PieroniJul 22, 2026

Conservation Commission member spoke in favor of the plan, calling Quimby a fantastic property that should be made available to the people of Hooksett.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 14:23 →
SupportiveCindy RobertsonJul 22, 2026

Former 21-year Conservation Commission chair strongly supported the plan, saying the land was purchased to prevent development and that Pinnacle and Heads Pond trails proved abutter fears don't materialize.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 16:00 →
SupportivePhil DenbowJul 22, 2026

Read an email from conservation commissioner Philip Fintanides supporting the plan, arguing easements predate abutters' purchases and objecting at the last minute doesn't make sense.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 19:40 →
SupportiveMike HorneJul 22, 2026

45-year resident with recreation experience supported the plan, citing Pinnacle and Heads Pond as examples where trails worked well for residents without harming abutters.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 22:01 →
MixedMark LacasseJul 22, 2026

Summit abutter presented survey evidence showing the proposed trail sits on his property, cited trespass, slippery summit, wetlands at the parking lot, and asked for a loop trail with a spur instead — supporting the plan overall but not the trails as mapped.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 56:25 →
OpposedJesse TringaleJul 22, 2026

Neighbor supported Lacasse's position, citing trespass risk, fire danger, emergency access, gun club proximity, and deed covenants barring public access through the subdivision; asked the council to amend out the summit trail.

Town Council - Jul 22, 2026 · 1:21:07 →